“Marie Long one step away from getting her wish”

Marie Long one step away from getting her wish

- Laurie Roberts, Arizona Republic published April 27, 2011

At long last, Marie Long is one simple signature away from getting her wish. Well, one of her wishes anyway.

Undoubtedly, she would wish to have some of her money back, the $821,000 sucked up by guardians and lawyers appointed to protect her from unscrupulous types who might come after an old lady’s life savings.

Marie’s attorneys, who for years have worked for free, are appealing her case. They hope to force Maricopa County’s probate court to reconsider Commissioner Lindsay Ellis’ decision that it was “reasonable” for Marie’s so-called protectors to basically drain an estate once worth $1.3 million, leaving her penniless and dependent on taxpayers for support.

But Marie is 89. She can’t wait forever to see justice. She knows that, which brings me to wish No. 2.
“I would like,” she told me last fall, “that this doesn’t happen to anybody else.”

This week or next, Marie’s wish could be granted, assuming Gov. Jan Brewer signs Senate Bill 1499 – and assuming the county’s probate judges burn their well-worn rubber stamps and remember who it is that they are there to protect.

Credit the Arizona Legislature. In between birther bills and tea party license plates, when they weren’t belatedly disclosing Fiesta Bowl junkets or lopping poor people off the state’s health care rolls, our leaders did a really good thing last week.

They passed a probate bill aimed at better protecting vulnerable people and giving them a voice in what happens to them and their money. The vote was unanimous.

…Unanimous, to allow those under the protection of probate to see monthly bank statements rather than waiting more than a year — or in the case of Marie, three years — to find out how the people appointed to watch over their money have spent it.

…Unanimous, to make it easier for wards to rid themselves of fiduciaries they don’t like. For years, fiduciaries have basically run the court and if you tried to fire them, they got to spend a good chunk of your money fending you off. The bill makes it clear that judges can – and should – remove a fiduciary if it’s in a ward’s best interest.

…Unanimous, to reinforce a recent appellate court ruling that says what should have been obvious all along – that fiduciaries and lawyers can’t run up charges that do nothing to benefit the vulnerable person footing the bill.

That they can’t raise their rates without first disclosing it, as the Sun Valley Group did when CEO Peter Frenette quietly boosted his pay by 26 percent, to $145 an hour, even as Marie’s funds were running low. As attorney Scott Ferris did when he raised his rate by 18 percent to $325 an hour, without telling R.B. Sleeth, whose “protection” included 10 weeks locked away in an Alzheimer’s unit — never mind that he didn’t have Alzheimer’s.

…Unanimous, that judges must in all things consider the “best interest” of the protected person, as they were always supposed to do. Just in case judges forget that — again, that is — the soon-to-be new law repeats it 17 times.

The bill isn’t perfect. Parts of it wouldn’t be needed had probate commissioners acted like judges rather than friends of for-profit fiduciaries.

But SB 1499 is a good start on granting Marie’s wish, that never again should an old lady be “protected” into the poorhouse while a judge does nothing to stop it and in fact actually approves it.

“This is a wake-up call,” said Marie’s attorney Jon Kitchel. “If nothing else, it’s a reminder to the judges that they need to be making decisions …in their (the ward’s) best interest. I think that’s a good thing.”

It is a good thing and I never thought I’d be saying this to the Arizona Legislature, but…

Thank you.

Editor’s note: Roberts’ sister, Arizona Court of Appeals Chief Judge Ann Timmer,  chairs a committee to review probate-court practices. The Republic is disclosing the relationship to avoid any perception of a conflict of interest.

(Column published April 27, 2011, The Arizona Republic)

About these ads

One response to ““Marie Long one step away from getting her wish”

  1. Marie Long hopefully has some victory in her fight. So many have been damaged by what the courts have allowed to happen. This is a disgrace and the judges should be ashamed of themselves…so should the fiduciaries who took advantage of the people they were appointed to protect. I don’t know how these people can sleep at night much less look at themselves in the mirror. They truly have ‘no soul’ and will reap what they sow.
    Thank you Laurie Roberts for telling the stories of the victims and for exposing what has been going on in the Probate court. This has been going on far to many years right under the noses of the lawmakers and everyone claims that they didn’t know what was going on….I don’t buy it! Not until Laurie’s stories and the victims started coming out of the woodwork did any one really look at what was going on. I just wonder how many people have been damaged by the probate court.
    Until there is accountability regarding the judges, the corruption will continue. The courts should not be allowed to oversee themselves, this breeds more corruption.
    AZ should be ashamed of it’s probate court and do a total overhaul!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s